고객지원

  • 고객 10대 서비스
  • 일반 기술자료
  • 냉각탑 열 성능시험
  • Q&A

전문 기술자료 대한민국 냉각탑 건설/설계 선도 전문업체 대일아쿠아

HOME > 고객지원 > 전문 기술자료


3) Critical Speed

The critical speed can be calculated by the following equation:

                                            1st Mode RF x 60
1st Mode Critical Speed = ----------------------- (rpm)
                                            Number of Blade

                                             2nd Mode RF x 60
2nd Mode Critical Speed = ------------------------ (rpm)
                                             Number of Blade

For example, fan diameter = 28 ft and number of blade = 9,

1st mode critical speed = 6.3 x 60 / 9 = 42.0 rpm.
(1st mode RF of 28 ft - 9 = 6.3 hz)

(Note that the 2nd mode RF do not need to consider.)

4) Resonant Frequency Margins

A first resonant peak ideally should not occur between "0" hz and the fans operating speed. If one does occur during acceleration from rest, it will show up only as a momentary "shudder", since most of fans reach full speed within 3 seconds or less. In case of variable speed drive however, a resonant peak between "0" and the operating speed presents a real problem. The fan must be prevented from running steady state at or near the resonance speed by means of an electronic lock-out of a narrow speed range.

In most cases, there is not necessary to consider the first critical speed and only to carefully consider the second critical speed. Typically, we recommend minimum 5% of RF separation between the first mode RF frequency and the blade passing frequency, or between the first mode RF frequency and the beam passing frequency. In any cases, beam passing and blade passing frequencies could not occur within the + 5% to - 5% of any RF modes. This is most important requirement in sizing a fan. (Note that the beam passing frequency consideration is not required for the steel or wood structure having the narrow beams.)

(1) RF Margin with Blade Passing Freq.: The formulations must be differently applied to obtain the RF Margin per the value in difference of first mode RF and blade passing frequency as follows;

Case I : First Mode RF > = Blade Passing Frequency

                       First Mode RF - Blade Passing Freq.
RF margin = ------------------------------------------------ x 100 (%)
                                     First Mode RF

Case II : Blade Passing Frequency >= First Mode RF

                       Blade Passing Freq. - First Mode RF
RF margin = ------------------------------------------------- x 100 (%)
                                     First Mode RF

(2) RF Margin with Beam Passing Freq.

Case III : First Mode RF > = Beam Passing Frequency

                       First Mode RF - Beam Passing Freq.
RF margin = ------------------------------------------------- x 100 (%)
                                    First Mode RF

Case IV : Beam Passing Frequency >= First Mode RF

                       Beam Passing Freq. - First Mode RF
RF margin = ------------------------------------------------- x 100 (%)
                                     First Mode RF

(3) Adjustment of RF Margin: The first mode RF is a fixed value as per the fan size & no. of blade. Only a choice for deciding this margin depends on the factor of blade passing frequency.

For increasing the RF margin it is required up or down the blade passing frequency with the adjustment of fan speed or number of fan blades. In case that the first mode RF is smaller than the blade passing frequency. (Case II), it is necessary to increase the blade passing frequency. This is very simple.

In opposite case that the first mode RF is larger than the blade passing frequency (Case I), in order to reduce the blade passing frequency it is required to decrease the fan speed or to decrease the number of fan blades. Lowering the number of blades or decreasing the fan speed, it could be another problem, which might exceed the maximum brake horse power per blade or which might be a considerable increase of brake horsepower of fan due to less number of blade.

Normally, we recommend that the fan bhp per blade must lower than the maximum bhp per blade by 4 bhp, since the fan blade of fiberglass composite may be damaged due to over torque. Especially if you did not consider the wind velocity surrounding the cooling tower at the initial fan design, it is necessary to have more margin for the maximum bhp/blade since fan bhp per blade might exceed considerably the maximum bhp/blade due to increase of airflow volume and static pressure due to wind velocity.

There is still a problem to decrease the number of blade. In reducing the fan rpm the fan pitch will be increased and the fan bhp will increase, too. Therefore, the problem is still same as reducing number of blades. So, you are required to increase the fan diameter.

Meantime, it is not simple to control the beam passing frequency since number of supporting beam is almost fixed and could not be adjusted. Only a choice is to increase or decrease the fan speed with the gear reducer.

For increasing the RF margin it is required up or down the beam passing frequency with the adjustment of fan speed. In case that the first mode RF is smaller than the beam passing freq., (Case IV), it is necessary to increase the fan speed in order to increase the blade passing frequency.

In opposite case that the first mode RF is larger than the beam passing freq. (Case III), in order to reduce the beam passing frequency it is required to decrease the fan speed. In case of decreasing the fan speed, it could be another problem as mentioned previously.

(4) Blade Harmonic Constants: The potential for magnification of forces when a critical range (resonance) is zero is very great, and depends on definition of harmonic constants and damping factors. The harmonic constant (KH) is a factor that is a function of wavefront conditions: it describes the potential of a blade to resonate in the harmonic situation (N = 2, 3, 4, ...) relative to an N = 1 first order response. The amplification factor (AF) of the blade can be calculated by: AF = KH + {[1 - (N x rpm/fd)2]2 + [2 z x (N x rpm/fd)]2}1/2, where the damping factor z = ln [x/(x + 1)] and x is the amplitude. At resonance, the frequency ratio N x rpm/fd equals 1, and the magnification factor (MF) by substitution into the above equation is: MF = KH/2 z.

Damping factors typically range from about 0.012 for metal blades to 0.036 for foam filled fiberglass polyester blades. The harmonic constants have been estimated to range from 0.24 to 1.0. Critical range and potential of the system should be investigated at fan installations where breakdowns are consistent or occur early in operating life. If it is determined that the system is approaching a critical range of operation, several remedies are possible. The easiest solution may be to disrupt the air-impulse excitation frequencies through removal or rearrangement of obstructions in the plenum. This will lower the harmonic constant of the tower, but can never remove all amplification potential.

A more positive method is to change the dynamic natural frequency of fan and move it out of critical range. This can be done either by changing the speed of the fan or by weighting the blades to change the natural frequency. In most cases, weighting the blades proves to be the more economical solution to the problem.

(5) Relation with Cooling Tower Structure and Blade Passing Frequency: In a cooling tower, air is moving over obstruction or beams blocked inlets, etc. It could mean a possible interaction in the structure or fan stack with blade passing frequency. Note that Hudson does not cover the frequency interaction in a cooling tower structure besides supporting beams since they are beyond fan maker's control. This interaction between the operating frequency and tower itself (i.e. blade passing frequency interaction with fan stack natural frequency) could be suited by tower manufacturer to avoid the resonant problem at tower.

In the application of wood structure tower and FRP fan stack, a special attention is required. To avoid the running of fan in the tower structure resonance and to control the vibration with the 80 microns at the gear reducer or the motor frame, the number of blades have to be carefully selected. For your information, 6 mils (1 mil = 0.001" = 25.4m, peak to peak) is the maximum vibration allowed on Air Cooled Heat Exchangers specifications. So, Hudson has adopted API spec. of 6 mils for gear reducers on cooling tower structures. It has been realistic for US constructed wooden towers.

This is to be considered a maximum limit on the gear reducer itself not a normal level. Common practice in US is to use the minimum recommended number of blades to reduce the vibration in the wood structure tower and FRP fan stack. This is to avoid dangerous air load induced pulsation on the fan cylinder. The fewer blades are occurring the higher air loads and are enlarging the more intense blade passing pulsation.

If you ask to guarantee the levels as low as 3 mils (0.003" = 76.2 microns), the dynamic field balancing would be required for the fans. Of course, the number of blades must be increased from the minimum number of blades (described in Chapter 1) at 80 microns or less requirement of vibration. To achieve the vibration limit on the wood structure tower and FRP fan stack, a check of frequencies must be done that there are no tower resonance at the blade passing frequency or 1 x fan rpm 60 frequency. While the concrete tower are so structurally stiff. So, fan vibration is rarely a problem.

If a vibration problem occurs in the field there are several options to correct the problem: First, you have to analyze the amplitude versa frequency for positively determining the problem. You are required to plot them via a vibration analyzer. This shows immediately amount of vibration and its frequency which tells where the vibration occurs. If the vibration occurs at the fan blade passing frequencies, the tower structures is in resonance with the fan blade passing frequency. This is not a problem of fan balance. It is very difficult to stiffen a wooden structure of fan stack. Most of time, to increase the number of blade is the least costly solution. But, if the problem was occurring at 1 x fan rpm / 60 (hz), this problem is due to the unbalance of fan assembly, which must be corrected properly by fan maker.

Meantime, you can easily understand that the fan stack is in resonance with fan blade passing frequency if you remove the fan stack (if the materials of fan stack is made of FRP) and run the fans at the rated rpm. Unless the problem is in 1 x fan rpm / 60 (hz), it's not a problem of fan balance. [If you consider the total unbalance as a vector (weight at some distance), it moves out of the plane of rotation only one time per revolution. Hence, 1 x fan rpm / 60 (hz) equals fan unbalance.] In general, the unbalance of fan could be corrected per below actions.

  • ●  Minimize tip track variation which is a major source of dynamic imbalance.
  • ●  Check the proper assembly of fan including hardware tightness, blades in the proper position, and blades at the equal pitch.
  • ●  Balance the fan "in place"
    (Note: "In place" balancing is effective because it takes the mass of the existing machinery mount and dynamic imbalance into consideration.)
  • ●  Change the fan blades or entire fan.

5) Fan Vibration Monitoring

A cooling tower fan is a rotating machine subject to the same laws of physics as any other. Cooling tower fans have three qualities that make dealing with them a special challenge. These qualities are 1) wet and corrosive environment, 2) slow rotational speeds, and 3) a wide range of support structure rigidity.

The basic fundamentals of vibrations are 1) All machines vibrate. 2) Vibration is caused by forces generated by rotation, reciprocation and impacts. 3)Vibration frequency equals rotational or reciprocating speed and multiples or repetition rate of impacts. 4) Many machine faults produce vibratory forces as follows;

  • ●  Unbalance at one time RPM.
  • ●  Aerodynamic unbalance at number of blades times RPM
  • ●  Misalignment at one, two and three times RPM
  • ●  Looseness at two times RPM
  • ●  Gear Faults at number of teeth times RPM
  • ●  Faulty rolling element bearings at RPM multiples

It is not the vibration that is harmful. Vibration is the symptom of the presence of vibratory forces and the mechanical faults that cause them. Forces cause wear and destruction not vibration. This view of vibration is most important when related to rotating machinery maintenance. From this viewpoint there are no vibration problems. There are mechanical problems that reveal their presence by the way they cause the machine to vibrate. Correct the mechanical problem and the symptom, vibration, will go away.

A typical cooling tower fan arrangement consisting of drive motor, drive shaft, gear reducer, and the fan. The fan normally rotates slowly, is multi bladed, with high tip speeds. The support structure may be wood, concrete or steel and not as stiff as the designer would like because of compromises made in favor of unrestricted air flow. The environment is usually highly corrosive and wet. This means most materials will deteriorate in time, producing a variety of problems.


To be continued. Please press the next button....